WoW : Cataclysm

[Kerevil]

Elle était déjà dispo vendredi soir péon!

[Grego]

La bande annonce est sortie!

http://www.wow-europe.com/cataclysm/med ... true#video

T'es à la bourre !
Ou alors c'est pour dire que c'est juste sur le site officiel maintenant

[Ouarl]

Rah bande de geek!

[Kaosi]

3 po que dans la zone Worgen on va avoir un mob qui s'appelle Drakulâ.

[Grego]

3 po que dans la zone Worgen on va avoir un mob qui s'appelle Drakulâ.

Evidemment le donneur de quête pour le buter sera le Dr Vhanne Hellsong.

[Kerevil]

Tiens Waarl, des infos exclusives sur les deux nouvelles races
http://www.wow-europe.com/fr/burningcrusade/index.html

[Ouarl]

Connard!

[Piccolo]

http://worldofwarcraft.judgehype.com/index.php

Des infos très intéressantes sur les changements concernant les guildes. Ktana va pouvoir encore plus nOus EclAirer Sur la RoutE DE lA ViE, O pUIssANt DiCtAteUr

Sinon il y a un exemple de voie des titans. Et je vois un truc réduction de dégâts. Alors une voie tank ? et à côté une voie dps, heal, pvp ? Super original...

[Grego]

Tu as 6 ou 7 voies je sais plus, il m'a semblé voir une liste sur MMO-Champion, avec le nom exact.

[Grego]

Pourquoi la voie des titans ? Pourquoi ceci ? Pourquoi cela ?
Le bleu nous a pondu pas mal d'explications :

Race and Faction Changes ETA
Cataclysm was just announced so it will be awhile before we have systems fully decided upon for it, especially since the paid faction change service isn't even out yet. That said I wouldn't be surprised if there were some restrictions to avoid people making level 80s of the new races on day 1, nothing is set in stone though so we will have to wait and see. (Source)

Reforging
Imagine reforging could work like enchanting, where there are specific recipes that everyone knows. Example: "Converts Spirit into 50% equivalent hit rating on gloves."

I'm not saying it would work like this, but something along those lines would be pretty comparable to existing features. (Source)

Titan's Path
Philosophically, it works like this. Leveling up is fun. You get new gear constantly, and every time you ding, you get new stats, new ranks of spells and possibly new spells. You improve every single hour you play, if not more frequently.

When you hit max level, this really slows down. If you raid or PvP you might get a new item once a week if you're lucky, and aside from gear, rewards are very infrequent.

The idea behind the paths is to offer max-level character progression over time that isn't tied to gear.

The feature is much more robust than this, but at a very conceptual level imagine that at level 85 you got a new talent point every week just for logging in. The rewards are slower than during the leveling period, but they are rewards that exist independent of gear. However on the other hand, you don't feel the need to race through them (in fact you can't) if you are focused on getting to max level and they don't bloat your spellbook with as many abilities as gaining actual whole levels (though they will add a few). Over time, the actual discussions about how to build a character will likely change and evolve in interesting ways. The new point might give you a reason to log in on non-raid nights or even if you've gotten a little burned out on raiding.

The mantra is "gated, not grindy." They will require you to do something, but they are also designed with the idea that you can't kill yourself trying to blast through them as fast as possible. (Source)

Why not one slide per class at Blizzcon?
For last year's Blizzcon we did a slide per class, but that meant the amount of detail we could offer was almost trivial (and particularly annoying for hybrids). There is no way to offer as much detail as players are looking for unless we have the DK panel, etc.

[...] I'm not sure the 10 minute summary of 10 classes would have worked well. Last year for instance we had one slide on priests and only really covered Mind Sear, so all of the healing priests were like "What about us?"

The class panel has always been popular, so they started offering it twice even before I got to Blizzard. There are probably other ways to do it though. Maybe you make the class panel really long the first time and make the second one just about Q&A. You have to think that we're going to have even more information to cover (and questions to answer) once Diablo and SC have shipped so maybe it will be even harder to justify doing a class panel twice.

If we hadn't covered items, then we could have done more classes. But the item changes were just as important. We could have put items with dungeons or systems, but those were busy too. Basically, we had a ton of info to share and only 2 days. Smiley

Handling questions asked on the floor is just as tricky as handling those asked on the forums. They may not be important to you, but they could be very important to the gal or guy asking the question. It doesn't seem fair to tell some people their issues aren't worthy before they even get to ask.

I don't have any great answers for how to handle it, but as with everything we do, we'll keep striving to improve it. (Source)

Reasons behind the item stats changes in Cataclysm
I find many of these arguments to be elitist. This is not a "catering to the casuals" issue. This is an issue that even some of our most educated and math-savy players could not make gear decisions without the help of external tools. We're much less concerned about more casual players because the specific choice of upgrade will mean less for them (skill outweighs the contribution of stats for all but the absolute best players) and they often choose pieces based on things like art over stats.

I'm talking about very hardcore raiders who no longer could eyeball a piece of gear with any degree of authority. I might believe that some very few of you are so proficient with the math as to be able to eyeball the stats, but I think you are vastly overestimating the number of players who can or do. Remember, the formula to convert armor penetration into damage was so complicated that we had to take the unusual step of actually spelling out how it was calculated.

With this change will you still have to make hard choices about upgrading? Absolutely. Will there still be quasi-religious debates about which neck is best in slot for a given spec? Of course. Will you still need to understand the mechanics to make the best choice for your character? We think so. One of our overall design philosophies for WoW (and Blizzard) is to be simple but have a lot of depth. Some people mistake needless complexity for depth.

Meanwhile, we think there is a lot of benefit of getting rid of problematic stats like defense and accomplishing things like letting casters improve by focusing on throughput over mana pool. (Source)

EDIT : news merdique => on ne pourra faire que 6 BG côtés par semaine...wèèèè !

[Ouarl]

Mais par contre j'ai vu sur le forum officiel que le phasing serait présent, enfin c'est à dire que les joueurs low level auront les zones telles qu'on les connait actuellement et que plus tard pour eux, elles se transformeraient en celle de cataclysme...

J'ai du mal à y croire, qu'en pensez/savez-vous?

[Yohko]

Le cataclysme est valable pour tout le monde : cela veut dire que même si tu achètes warcraft sans extension tu auras les nouveaux décors.

Le phasing va jouer un peu comme le début du chevalier de la mort : au fur et a mesure des quêtes le décor évolue : un bâtiment disparait ou est en feu, une faction gagne du terrain sur la région etc

En gros, si j'ai bien compris, ils veulent intégrer dans l'ancien monde ce qui a fait le succès de wotlk et permettre a tout le monde d'en profiter.

Ce changement va encore desservir l'outreterre qui risque de devenir la pire partie du leveling

[Marfa]

Message de Nerimash sur wow europe :

Quelques précisions au sujet des champs de bataille cotés :

Il n’y aura pas de limitation à 6 batailles comme nous l’avions indiqué précédemment, le texte a été édité : http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.htm ... 8182&sid=2

Ensuite, il ne devrait pas être possible de vous y inscrire seuls. Si vous souhaitez participer, il faudra au préalable avoir constitué un groupe (de raid) complet. Les développeurs ont choisi de procéder ainsi car ils considèrent que les joueurs faisant parti d’un raid seront impliqués dans le combat en champ de bataille. De plus, cela permet plus facilement de déterminer la « valeur » de votre groupe, de vous proposer un adversaire à votre taille et de vous récompenser de manière appropriée.

Les joueurs spécialisés « abs » devraient pouvoir être renvoyés du groupe de raid par le chef du raid, cela devrait donc permettre de ne pas se retrouver dans des situations où certains pénalisent leur camp en ne participant pas au champ de bataille.

Les développeurs souhaitent également rappeler que World of Warcraft est avant un jeu qui se joue en groupe, particulièrement pour le contenu de haut-niveau. Par conséquent, cela demande un effort d’organisation qui est à la hauteur des récompenses.

Certains d’entre vous semblent inquiets quant aux problèmes qu’ils pourraient avoir à trouver un groupe. Les développeurs ont indiqué qu’ils n’avaient aucune intention de ne vous laisser que le canal commerce comme unique méthode pour trouver des coéquipiers. Nous vous en dirons plus à ce sujet dès que de nouvelles informations seront disponibles.

Cay bon tu peux revenir Grego !!

[Grego]

Pour que ça soit jouable en équipe, Alterac passera de 40 à 25 au passage. 

[Arko]